WNN

Representing Africa Worldwide

“Israel Dismally Failed in its Defence Before the ICJ”, Says South Africa Israel’s critics say that such measures have done little to prevent the high toll and that its bombings are so powerful that they often amount to indiscriminate or disproportionate attacks.  The said strikes have target locations in so-called safe zone designated by Israel Defence Forces.

3 min read
Share This Story

On the final day of the preliminary hearings in the Israel genocide case, Israel’s defence focused on the brutality of the Oct. 7 attacks.

The team presented chilling video and audio to a hushed audience.

It said Friday (Jan. 11) that it takes measures to protect civilians, such as issuing evacuation orders ahead of strikes. It blames Hamas for the high civilian death toll, saying the group uses residential areas to stage attacks and for other military purposes.

Israel’s critics say that such measures have done little to prevent the high toll and that its bombings are so powerful that they often amount to indiscriminate or disproportionate attacks.

The said strikes have target locations in so-called safe zone designated by Israel Defence Forces.

However, Palestine thanked South Africa the support. President of South Africa said, “I’ve never felt as proud as I felt today when our legal team was arguing our case in The Hague at the International Court of Justice”

South Africa’s justice minister who leads the nation’s delegation stood by his team’s case.

“Today we have heard Israel’s purported justification before the ICJ. Some of the points made are astonishing and are not backed by facts and the situation on the ground,” Ronald Lamola said.

“Israel suggests that the Genocide Convention is primary for their protection, and because of that, is not capable of violating its own provisions. The State of Israel today has failed to disprove South Africa’s compelling case that was presented before the court yesterday,” Lamola added.

Israel says South Africa’s request for an immediate halt to the Gaza fighting, amounts to an attempt to prevent Israel from defending itself against that assault.

Even when acting in self-defence, countries are required by international law to follow the rules of war, which South Africa has argued.

Judges must decide if Israel has upheld or violated its obligations  as stipulated in the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide which it signed in 1949.

Genocide

Israel often boycotts international tribunals and U.N. investigations, saying they are unfair and biased.

But this time, Israeli leaders took the rare step of sending a high-level legal team — a sign of how seriously they regard the case and likely their fear that any court order to halt operations would be a major blow to the country’s international standing.

Israeli legal advisor Tal Becker told a packed auditorium at the ornate Palace of Peace in The Hague that the country is fighting a “war it did not start and did not want.”

“In these circumstances, there can hardly be a charge more false and more malevolent than the allegation against Israel of genocide,” he added, noting that the horrible suffering of civilians in war was not enough to level that charge.

-With Agency Input

Dr. M Shahid Siddiqui (PhD), Follow via X (Twitter) @shahidsiddiqui

Leave a Reply

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Powered by UPAM .